Announcement

GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? WE LIVE INSIDE A DREAM. GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? NO MORE SPAM
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT THE FORUMS ARE DEAD AND THAT THE LIFE OF THE PARTY CURRENTLY RESIDES IN #FAIL #EEFORUMSANARCHY #EEFORUMS #hi ON RIZON.

YO RIZON #HI
it's closing time you don't have to go home but you can't stay here

Advertisement

»  » 

Pages: 1

#1 2012-03-17 19:17:06

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

So… are we back?

Seems a bit more stable now...

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#2 2012-03-18 18:53:57

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: So… are we back?

Yeah, it does...

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#3 2012-03-18 19:08:47

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: So… are we back?

But, unfortunately, not totally…

That's a problem.

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#4 2012-03-18 19:09:03

Coolio
That one guy
From: ...Huh. Where am I again?
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 5,354
Fails: 55,555

Re: So… are we back?

0.o Still slowing down... But at least I can get here.

L3srd6t.png

Offline

#5 2012-03-18 23:14:02

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: So… are we back?

Well… I seem to be getting the right page about 2/3 of the time. Pretty good :pedosmile:

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#6 2012-03-20 09:45:16

scienceguyz
VIF
Registered: 2012-03-04
Posts: 1,791
Fails: 114

Re: So… are we back?

I think.... I actually can post now.

Got a connection has timed out after posting. Speak of the Devil, eh?

Last edited by scienceguyz (2012-03-20 09:46:08)

No longer part of Fail. Sorry.

Offline

#7 2012-03-20 11:18:15

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: So… are we back?

It appears to be working perfectly for me now. Nice.

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#8 2012-03-20 12:44:01

scienceguyz
VIF
Registered: 2012-03-04
Posts: 1,791
Fails: 114

Re: So… are we back?

Great.
PARTAH!

No longer part of Fail. Sorry.

Offline

#9 2012-03-20 15:12:19

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: So… are we back?

-__- I hate 000webhost. I don't think the problem being almost-fixed was their doing. I think it just happened to fix itself here. Why? They're still telling me to upgrade and to tell my users to press F5 and reload the page. I'm starting to think it'd be worth it to place a few ads at the bottom and maybe one banner at the top and go with a cheap paid host instead.
Rat, you know any good cheap hosts?

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#10 2012-03-20 15:32:34

Coolio
That one guy
From: ...Huh. Where am I again?
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 5,354
Fails: 55,555

Re: So… are we back?

Still not working occasionally...

L3srd6t.png

Offline

#11 2012-03-20 15:42:20

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: So… are we back?

furqi uses justhost, not sure how much it costs. I think you get a discount if you press the secret link on the bottom (don't tell them I said that).

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#12 2012-03-20 16:47:09

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: So… are we back?

secret link? *checks it out*
coolbeans

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

Pages: 1

Board footer

Jump to

We use Fail. Fail uses FluxBB

[ Generated in 0.015 seconds, 35 queries executed - Memory usage: 576.88 KiB (Peak: 600.55 KiB) ]