Announcement

GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? WE LIVE INSIDE A DREAM. GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? NO MORE SPAM
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT THE FORUMS ARE DEAD AND THAT THE LIFE OF THE PARTY CURRENTLY RESIDES IN #FAIL #EEFORUMSANARCHY #EEFORUMS #hi ON RIZON.

YO RIZON #HI
it's closing time you don't have to go home but you can't stay here

Advertisement

»  » 

Pages: 1

#1 2011-11-29 22:17:55

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

New BBCode tags!

We have two new bbcode tags, and one updated tag. Here's a nice list:

[ invis ] Nearly invisible text [ /invis ] Nearly invisible text
[ burn ] Warning: Flammable [ /burn ] Warning: Flammable

[ sarcasm ] has been updated so that if you have more than one word after sarcasm, it will work. [sarcasm=More than one word.]This is the best update of them all.[/sarcasm]

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#2 2011-11-30 07:17:10

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: New BBCode tags!

[sarcasm=This is such a fail]NOWAILOLJKJKJK IT WORKS[/sarcasm]

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#3 2011-11-30 07:43:38

rob1nfly
Waffle Inspector
From: In a secret paradox
Registered: 2011-07-28
Posts: 886
Fails: 443

Re: New BBCode tags!

why dont you use the "code" box?

rob1nfly.png kitteh1.gif

Offline

#4 2011-11-30 15:59:39

Beast
Failure
Registered: 2011-11-29
Posts: 13
Fails: 7

Re: New BBCode tags!

NOWAILOLJKJKJK in testing!!! LOOL NOWAILOLJKJKJK!!!!

Last edited by Beast (2011-11-30 16:03:23)

7pc5z.png

Offline

#5 2011-11-30 18:17:43

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: New BBCode tags!

rob1n: Didn't feel like it. tongue

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#6 2011-12-02 16:22:30

Coolio
That one guy
From: ...Huh. Where am I again?
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 5,354
Fails: 55,555

Re: New BBCode tags!

[sarcasm=Probably not.]Can you do text specialness with sarcasm?[/sarcasm]

EDIT: Found new bug. To see it, press quote.

L3srd6t.png

Offline

#7 2011-12-02 17:05:14

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: New BBCode tags!

[sarcasm=Yep, use this instead]Does it work with the burn tag outside?[/sarcasm]

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#8 2011-12-02 17:15:04

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: New BBCode tags!

Coolio wrote:

[sarcasm=Probably not.]Can you do text specialness with sarcasm?[/sarcasm]

EDIT: Found new bug. To see it, press quote.

Interesting bug

o.o wat. How'd you do that?

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#9 2011-12-02 17:23:48

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: New BBCode tags!

Uuhhh... He put a burn tag inside a sarcasm tag... is one of them block level and one of them inline? That would explain it, if sarcasm uses a span tag and burn uses a div tag

Wait, I checked the source. Maybe phrase elements aren't allowed to have inline elements (or maybe just span elements) inside them. I told you to just use span rather than abbr.

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#10 2011-12-02 18:53:14

rob1nfly
Waffle Inspector
From: In a secret paradox
Registered: 2011-07-28
Posts: 886
Fails: 443

Re: New BBCode tags!

huh. weird.

rob1nfly.png kitteh1.gif

Offline

#11 2011-12-02 20:21:39

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: New BBCode tags!

Ratburntro44 wrote:

Uuhhh... He put a burn tag inside a sarcasm tag... is one of them block level and one of them inline? That would explain it, if sarcasm uses a span tag and burn uses a div tag

Wait, I checked the source. Maybe phrase elements aren't allowed to have inline elements (or maybe just span elements) inside them. I told you to just use span rather than abbr.

No you didn't. The code you gave me clearly said <abbr title="adsgfsfadgdf">, not <span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #777;" title="asgdgh">

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#12 2011-12-03 18:40:18

Coolio
That one guy
From: ...Huh. Where am I again?
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 5,354
Fails: 55,555

Re: New BBCode tags!

No time to discuss your nerdiness of CSS code. WE STILL HAVE A BUG HERE. Unless you want to make code rules.

L3srd6t.png

Offline

#13 2011-12-03 18:40:26

Coolio
That one guy
From: ...Huh. Where am I again?
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 5,354
Fails: 55,555

Re: New BBCode tags!

No time to discuss your nerdiness of CSS code. WE STILL HAVE A BUG HERE. Unless you want to make code rules.

L3srd6t.png

Offline

#14 2011-12-03 18:44:13

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: New BBCode tags!

Wellll how'd you do it?

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#15 2011-12-03 19:01:56

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: New BBCode tags!

Different55 wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:

Uuhhh... He put a burn tag inside a sarcasm tag... is one of them block level and one of them inline? That would explain it, if sarcasm uses a span tag and burn uses a div tag

Wait, I checked the source. Maybe phrase elements aren't allowed to have inline elements (or maybe just span elements) inside them. I told you to just use span rather than abbr.

No you didn't. The code you gave me clearly said <abbr title="adsgfsfadgdf">, not <span style="border-bottom: 1px dotted #777;" title="asgdgh">

That's what I originally said. Then I realized it might not be a good idea and told you you should change it.

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

#16 2011-12-03 19:03:53

rob1nfly
Waffle Inspector
From: In a secret paradox
Registered: 2011-07-28
Posts: 886
Fails: 443

Re: New BBCode tags!

[strikethrough]no, we should replace the BBcode with CSS. Then i can have a navbar as my sig.[/strikethrough]
I THOUGHT WE HAD A STRIKETHROUGH

Last edited by rob1nfly (2011-12-03 19:04:35)

rob1nfly.png kitteh1.gif

Offline

#17 2011-12-03 19:12:34

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: New BBCode tags!

^it wouldn't work. HTML makes the stuff, CSS makes it pretty. Just css all by itself is a blank page with potential to be pretty.

and we do, just not on the main tongue

Last edited by Different55 (2011-12-03 19:13:00)

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#18 2011-12-03 19:27:01

rob1nfly
Waffle Inspector
From: In a secret paradox
Registered: 2011-07-28
Posts: 886
Fails: 443

Re: New BBCode tags!

move it on heah!

rob1nfly.png kitteh1.gif

Offline

#19 2011-12-03 19:27:59

Coolio
That one guy
From: ...Huh. Where am I again?
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 5,354
Fails: 55,555

Re: New BBCode tags!

No, cause then people need to learn CSS.

L3srd6t.png

Offline

#20 2011-12-03 19:31:47

rob1nfly
Waffle Inspector
From: In a secret paradox
Registered: 2011-07-28
Posts: 886
Fails: 443

Re: New BBCode tags!

i sort of know it now! i took a tutorial this mornin.

rob1nfly.png kitteh1.gif

Offline

#21 2011-12-04 06:31:10

Hammy120
Failure
Registered: 2011-12-04
Posts: 3
Fails: 2

Re: New BBCode tags!

Test Test

Last edited by Hammy120 (2011-12-04 06:33:04)

Offline

#22 2011-12-09 16:03:42

colon
"Furry"
From: 4444
Registered: 2011-06-25
Posts: 5,109
Fails: 3
Website

Re: New BBCode tags!

[*]whats this do..[/*]

what the ****

Offline

#23 2011-12-09 16:29:11

Different55
The Beanmaker
Registered: 2011-05-18
Posts: 9,143
Fails: 0

Re: New BBCode tags!

list *<list element>/* /list

Jet fuel can't make dank memes.

Offline

#24 2011-12-09 19:00:12

Ratburntro44
Member
Registered: 2011-10-28
Posts: 3,370
Fails: 100,959

Re: New BBCode tags!

  • trololol

  • is this a LIST?

  • yay it worky

  • omnomnomnomnom

  • what was the point of this? Oh yeah, to demonstrate how the list looks.

31
SEfX29x.png

Offline

Pages: 1

Board footer

Jump to

We use Fail. Fail uses FluxBB

[ Generated in 0.023 seconds, 61 queries executed - Memory usage: 623.07 KiB (Peak: 662.73 KiB) ]