Announcement

GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? WE LIVE INSIDE A DREAM. GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? GOOGLE CHROME IS A BOTNET? NO MORE SPAM
FRIENDLY REMINDER THAT THE FORUMS ARE DEAD AND THAT THE LIFE OF THE PARTY CURRENTLY RESIDES IN #FAIL #EEFORUMSANARCHY #EEFORUMS #hi ON RIZON.

YO RIZON #HI
it's closing time you don't have to go home but you can't stay here

Advertisement

»  » 

Pages: 1

#1 2014-08-31 04:46:12

IceYoshi
Failure
Registered: 2014-08-07
Posts: 87
Fails: 125

that boy

so i am so angry about that 5 year old boy who is parents stole him from the hospital but the boy had brain cancer the parents was not allowed to take him from hospital as he needed to be in hospital 24 7. so now he could die becuse his parents took him out the hospital

i would put link it but i cant remember how

realdone.gif

Offline

#2 2014-08-31 04:47:46

colon
"Furry"
From: 4444
Registered: 2011-06-25
Posts: 5,109
Fails: 3
Website

Re: that boy

He was found in the south of spain but he's in a really bad condition

what the ****

Offline

#3 2014-08-31 04:48:48

IceYoshi
Failure
Registered: 2014-08-07
Posts: 87
Fails: 125

Re: that boy

but he would not be in bad state if they did not take him away i dont understand why parents would do that

realdone.gif

Offline

#4 2014-08-31 04:52:34

colon
"Furry"
From: 4444
Registered: 2011-06-25
Posts: 5,109
Fails: 3
Website

Re: that boy

They didn't think the hospital was doing well, and they believedthat they could take care of him without him needing to be in hospital, but they don't know much science then because if someone's needing treatment youu can't deny them it

what the ****

Offline

Pages: 1

Board footer

Jump to

We use Fail. Fail uses FluxBB

[ Generated in 0.013 seconds, 21 queries executed - Memory usage: 559.92 KiB (Peak: 577.73 KiB) ]