different infiltrated a forum

z · 2015-05-18 18:45:37

http://failforums.roflforum.net/t7-this-place

gg

Bugle · 2015-05-18 18:47:32

Different55 · 2015-05-18 22:26:28

Oh dear bob why ;_;

So much cringe in only a year.

That said, how'd you find that place? What'd you search on google to bring that up?

Onjit · 2015-05-19 06:04:05

wew

s6thgaming · 2015-05-19 09:42:45

I love how Different is on the top posters leaderboard.

Different55 wrote:

What'd you search on google to bing that up?

FTFY

Different55 · 2015-05-19 09:45:04

s6thgaming wrote:

I love how Different is on the top posters leaderboard.
Different55 wrote:
What'd you search on google to bing that up?
FTFY

This feels wronger than any of the things I've ever wronged.

And it wasn't hard to get on the top posters leaderboard since there are only like 2 other people on there who have ever posted.

Pingohits · 2015-05-19 16:42:39

lets ddos the website

s6thgaming · 2015-05-19 20:12:37

That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?

Pingohits · 2015-05-19 20:33:29

my english teacher? he only uses bing for free steam funds

s6thgaming · 2015-05-19 21:00:32

Pingohits wrote:

my english teacher? he only uses bing for free steam funds

you can do that

brb doing that

Bing best search engine 2015 MW

Different55 · 2015-05-20 09:08:26

"Best"

"Search engine"

Pingohits · 2015-05-20 09:14:34

duckduckgo is best

Different55 · 2015-05-20 09:25:33

"""""best"""""

duckduckgo has some of the worst results I've ever seen.

z · 2015-05-21 11:44:09

Different55 wrote:

That said, how'd you find that place? What'd you search on google to bring that up?

Different55 · 2015-05-21 13:11:35

z wrote:

Different55 wrote:
That said, how'd you find that place? What'd you search on google to bring that up?

neat

Ratburntro44 · 2015-05-21 14:05:53

s6thgaming wrote:

That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?

bing is the best

As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.

(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")

Coolio · 2015-05-21 16:47:44

Ratburntro44 wrote:

s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")

Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.

Pingohits · 2015-05-24 18:50:15

Coolio wrote:

Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.

oh my god you're alive

colon · 2015-05-26 17:31:18

Pingohits wrote:

Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive

what really

Pingohits · 2015-05-26 17:50:38

colon wrote:

Pingohits wrote:
Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive
what really

oh my god you're alive as well

SPT · 2015-05-26 17:58:09

Pingohits wrote:

colon wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive
what really
oh my god you're alive as well

guys im alive and im important

Bugle · 2015-05-26 18:07:21

Duck wrote:

Pingohits wrote:
colon wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive
what really
oh my god you're alive as well
guys im alive and im important

yes, bugles are important, youre a bugle.

Pingohits · 2015-05-26 18:35:47

Bugle wrote:

Duck wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
colon wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive
what really
oh my god you're alive as well
guys im alive and im important
yes, bugles are important, youre a bugle.

no you are n1kf

Bugle · 2015-05-26 18:48:12

Pingohits wrote:

Bugle wrote:
Duck wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
colon wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive
what really
oh my god you're alive as well
guys im alive and im important
yes, bugles are important, youre a bugle.
no you are n1kf

bugle is not n1kf, n1kf is a bugle.

skullz17 · 2015-06-27 15:04:25

Bugle wrote:

Pingohits wrote:
Bugle wrote:
Duck wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
colon wrote:
Pingohits wrote:
Coolio wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
s6thgaming wrote:
That reminds me, who was the guy that was adamant that Bing was better than Google?
bing is the best
As a little test, I just looked for Fail on both Google and Bing right now. While neither had the new domain it its results, Google still had the dead old domain left in its results and giving bad links.
(What's really weird, though, is that Google has links to subsections of the website under the main link; these subsections are "Fails", "Forum Games", "Coolio", and "Ratburntro44")
Because clearly we are the only subsections that matter here.
oh my god you're alive
what really
oh my god you're alive as well
guys im alive and im important
yes, bugles are important, youre a bugle.
no you are n1kf
bugle is not n1kf, n1kf is a bugle.

i am alive

Announcement

Advertisement

#1 2015-05-18 18:45:37

different infiltrated a forum

#2 2015-05-18 18:47:32

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#3 2015-05-18 22:26:28

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#4 2015-05-19 06:04:05

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#5 2015-05-19 09:42:45

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#6 2015-05-19 09:45:04

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#7 2015-05-19 16:42:39

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#8 2015-05-19 20:12:37

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#9 2015-05-19 20:33:29

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#10 2015-05-19 21:00:32

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#11 2015-05-20 09:08:26

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#12 2015-05-20 09:14:34

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#13 2015-05-20 09:25:33

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#14 2015-05-21 11:44:09

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#15 2015-05-21 13:11:35

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#16 2015-05-21 14:05:53

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#17 2015-05-21 16:47:44

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#18 2015-05-24 18:50:15

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#19 2015-05-26 17:31:18

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#20 2015-05-26 17:50:38

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#21 2015-05-26 17:58:09

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#22 2015-05-26 18:07:21

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#23 2015-05-26 18:35:47

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#24 2015-05-26 18:48:12

Re: different infiltrated a forum

#25 2015-06-27 15:04:25

Re: different infiltrated a forum

Board footer