If browsers were guns

Ratburntro44 · 2012-06-12 08:52:11

Safari works just fine. I'll have you know that Safari supports more CSS3 than Opera, The Browser That Will Not Be Named (lol), Firefox, and almost exactly the same ones as Chrome, likely due to the fact that Chrome and Safari are both based off of WebKit. The only thing Chrome has on Safari is column-span, which is useless because the exact same thing can be done by just putting the text above the column area.

I will give Opera credit for needing a prefix on fewer things, but when it does you don't even know for sure whether it'll be -o- or -xv-, which is confusing.

Either way, The Browser That Will Not Be Named is the standard in web development simply due to it being the lowest common denominator, if you don't count CSS ruby stuff.

Different55 · 2012-06-12 14:09:15

Safari? Lol. Usernubs don't care about CSS. They care that when you type in "How to eat a cheese" into the address bar, you get a server not found error instead of google.

Ratburntro44 · 2012-06-12 14:58:11

It affects them; they get to see fancier websites. In addition, I'm perfectly capable of using a separate search and address bar; I actually prefer it, and am angry that Apple is going to be changing it.

Besides, I'd rather see an error than google.

Different55 · 2012-06-12 16:21:15

not much fancier. Websites look perfectly fine without the tiny details most people won't notice. What separate search bar? There's only an address bar on my grandma's mac. Fine, then bing. But still.

colon · 2012-08-25 09:30:50

CHROME is a rocket launcher with a machine gun attachment.

Different55 · 2012-08-25 15:51:00

*that jams frequently causing it to blow up in your face.

colon · 2012-08-27 13:06:07

Different55 wrote:

*that jams frequently causing it to blow up in your face.

nope.

Ratburntro44 · 2012-08-27 13:41:31

colon wrote:

Different55 wrote:
*that jams frequently causing it to blow up in your face.
yep.

Fix'd.

colon · 2012-08-27 13:46:21

Ratburntro44 wrote:

colon wrote:
Different55 wrote:
*that jams frequently causing it to blow up in your face.
nope.
Not Fix'd.

Properly fix'd.

Different55 · 2012-08-27 15:26:48

colon wrote:

Ratburntro44 wrote:
colon wrote:
Different55 wrote:
*that jams frequently causing it to blow up in your face.
nope.
Not Fix'd.
Properly fix'd.

Either way, the original statement that chrome blows up in your face is correct.

colon · 2012-08-27 15:58:58

Different55 wrote:

colon wrote:
Ratburntro44 wrote:
colon wrote:
Different55 wrote:
*that jams frequently causing it to blow up in your face.
nope.
Not Fix'd.
Properly fix'd.
Either way, the original statement that chrome blows up in your face is correct.

Nope.

Different55 · 2012-08-27 16:57:13

Let me see if I can find my copy of chrome, then I'll use it for a day and take a screenshot of every error I get.

colon · 2012-08-27 18:26:19

Different55 wrote:

Let me see if I can find my copy of chrome, then I'll use it for a day and take a screenshot of every error I get.

u will no get errors.

Announcement

Advertisement

#26 2012-06-12 08:52:11

Re: If browsers were guns

#27 2012-06-12 14:09:15

Re: If browsers were guns

#28 2012-06-12 14:58:11

Re: If browsers were guns

#29 2012-06-12 16:21:15

Re: If browsers were guns

#30 2012-08-25 09:30:50

Re: If browsers were guns

#31 2012-08-25 15:51:00

Re: If browsers were guns

#32 2012-08-27 13:06:07

Re: If browsers were guns

#33 2012-08-27 13:41:31

Re: If browsers were guns

#34 2012-08-27 13:46:21

Re: If browsers were guns

#35 2012-08-27 15:26:48

Re: If browsers were guns

#36 2012-08-27 15:58:58

Re: If browsers were guns

#37 2012-08-27 16:57:13

Re: If browsers were guns

#38 2012-08-27 18:26:19

Re: If browsers were guns

Board footer